|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Petition to the House of Lords This Petition is from me, Phyllis Jayaratne to the House of Lords (HOL) my former employer and to the Lord Chief Justice Sir John Thomas in order for me to obtain my appropriate remuneration which has been withheld by HOL for over 11 years of my actual employment. However taking into consideration the time period since I have left the HOL the total time factor that my appropriate remuneration has been withheld is 25 years. This is an extremely long period that I have waited and constantly battled to obtain what is due to me by rights, Justice delayed is Justice denied. HOL violated an intrinsic principle laid down by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 23 which states: “Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work”.
I am in significant financial hardship due to the HOL unlawfully withholding of my appropriate remuneration without any explanation, is only due to Racism and racism only. The financial hardship is more acute as the withholding of my appropriate remuneration had a direct adverse impact on my only source of income i.e. State and Occupational Pensions thus, reducing me to poverty. Lord Irvine the then Lord Chancellor had a unique triple role whereby among his various responsibilities he appointed the President and Chairmen of the ETs. Lord Irvine bribed the Chairman of the ET, Mr Andrew Bano with the offer of a promotion to the post of Social Security & Child Support Commissioner in order to dismiss my race claim. In spite of my numerous correspondences as regards this specific Bribery issue among others to the former and current Lord Chief Justices and the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, I have not been sued for libel because my claims are true! Further information re the Bribery, Corruption and the manifestation of the Unfair Trial, please visit my website: www.racialabuse-houseoflords.com. I was working 67 hours p.w. and instead of paying me for the 67 hours p.w. and offering me a full time post, my hours were reduced to 13.9 hours p.w. in order for me to claim State Benefits. Furthermore 7 full time posts fell vacant within my (Refreshment) Department over several years and in addition my white comparator was recruited for 30 hours p.w. on the pretext of helping me with my heavy workload. Instead of such a recruitment, I should have been offered full time employment. These injustices caused me great distress/anxiety. White colleagues were paid promptly for 80 hours p.w. In fact these long hours have been documented in Mr Bano’s Decision, “However it is not in dispute that throughout her employment the Applicant has worked very much longer than her contracted hours and it appears to have been frequent for her to work up to 60 hours p.w”. In spite of the above, Mr Bano failed to make an order for HOL to pay my remuneration because he accepted the bribe. The Employment Statutes have provision for such Orders. As Mr Bano frequently reminded the Court during the trial, “I have no time” ; “I have other matters to attend to”, as he accepted the Bribe, the issue of Non-Payment was never raised although he implicitly understood that I was not paid for the long hours I worked, hence Mr Bano’s comments as above. Mr Bano was forced to come to the above conclusion of long hours because of my evidence submitted at the hearing in addition to the HOL (Respondents’) Witness Statements which documented that 2 full time employees were recruited for 90 hours p.w. to carry out my workload of 67 hours p.w. for which I was paid only for 13.9 hours p.w. My long hours at work were mainly due to Desk Top Publishing (DTP) duty which I was allocated with no training, and with WordPerfect 5.1. Mr Bano stated at the hearing that this software package was incompatible and that I should have been given either Quark Express or Page Maker. This evidence/ findings as well as other numerous favourable evidence/findings Mr Bano failed to include in his Decision apart from my long hours, which I believe was a pure oversight either by him or by the corrupt unit/ person responsible for perverting the course of justice. I should also state that prior to the allocation of the DTP duty to me it was carried out by an outside printing firm at a cost of £90,000 per annum. At great personal distress I carried out the DTP duty effectively and efficiently at the same professional standard as the outside printers with no training. I did so by referring to the instruction manual which I was given instead of the training. As I stated above, I worked 67 hours p.w. but paid only for 13.9 hours p.w., Lorna McWilliam my line manager confirmed to the DWP that I was working only 13.9 hours p.w. THIS WAS FRAUDULENT. HOL did not pay the appropriate National Insurance Contributions relating to my long hours of work, therefore they are also culpable of FRAUD. Due to the above fraudulent actions my Occupational and State Pensions are abysmal as they were based on fraudulent hours of work of 13.9 hours p.w. rather than the actual 67 hours pw. As a result I suffer significant financial hardship and deteriorating health. My race complaints were never investigated by the HOL, because “RACISM IS EVERYWHERE EVEN IN CIVIL SERVICE. MISS MCWILLIAM BELONGS TO A DIFFERENT GENERATION AND CANNOT BE CORRECTED”, as stated by Mr Geoffrey Embleton the then Deputy Establishment Officer at a meeting in the presence of Sir Michael Davies, who was the then Clerk of the Parliaments. My degrading and inhumane treatment were further manifested when I was allocated a filthy, mice infested office room which had no ventilation for over 2 years. I was forced to clean this room myself while the white colleagues had cleaners to clean their offices. HOL saved money by forcing me to clean my office, because I am non-white. The media exposure is a pre-requisite. This is specially so in a case like mine when fighting the establishment. If even Andrew Mitchell the former Tory Chief Whip found it difficult to fight an established institution the common man or woman would have had no chance unless the press supports the person concerned. I quote a statement in the Sunday Times editorial where it stated, “Our role of the press is to ensure that the bad guys do not get away with it”. It is a matter of utter disbelief and great disappointment that the press have not taken up my case specifically as regards Non-Payment of salary. It is a legal fact that newspapers are required to observe the requirements of contempt of court laws, but in this particular case, the issue of the Non-Payment of the appropriate remuneration was never deliberated upon, hence the contempt of court laws is not applicable and should not be an issue or an impediment. The non-publication of the Non-Payment of remuneration and the circumstances relating to it was a serious error of judgment by the newspapers which would erode public confidence in the newspaper industry. Please visit my website: www.racialabuse-houseoflords.com. As a result of my website I received various responses/ comments specifically from James Bano the brother of Judge Bano who informed me that Judge Bano “attempted suicide” and that I should remove my website. I refused to remove my website, and Mr Bano who was once again promoted to the post of a Judge in July 2013, ‘RETIRED’ in October 2013. The issue of exploitation and non-payment, one would not recognise with an august institution such as the HOL in its judicial capacity which is the benchmark for justice and integrity. Please sign this Petition in order for me to obtain my appropriate unpaid remuneration £243,622 so that I could carry on with the remainder of my life. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please send comments to: phyljay@racialabuse-houseoflords.com |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Please sign the petition by filling the section below:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||